Specialised Applied Sciences

Marine & Ocean Engineering

Research support on ships, offshore structures, hydrodynamics and ocean environments, with simulation, wave and load analysis and data interpretation.

Last updated:

  • DivisionSpecialised Applied Sciences
  • Scope items5 defined
  • Typical inputs3 to share
  • Agreed deliverables3 outputs

Service overview

Mining, petroleum, agricultural, food, biomedical, marine, applied physics and nanotechnology. This service is part of that division and is scoped individually around what you need to learn, decide or publish.

Marine and ocean engineering addresses ships, offshore platforms, ports, coastal structures and ocean energy devices in an environment of waves, currents, wind and corrosion. Loads are random and irregular, structures interact with the fluid, and failure consequences can be severe. Research relies on hydrodynamic theory, model testing, numerical simulation and statistical analysis of metocean data.

The sea state is described statistically, with design values defined by return periods, so extreme-value analysis of limited records is central. Numerical models must capture wave-structure interaction with enough accuracy but within computational limits. This service supports hydrodynamic analysis, wave-load and motion concepts, structural response and ocean-data statistics, without providing classification-society approvals or design certification.

If you plan to publish the outcome, see manuscript & publication support, for example computational & simulation manuscripts or original research article writing.

What this service covers

Problems this service can address

  • Complex environmental loading
  • Hydrodynamic interaction between waves and structures
  • Limited full-scale measurements

Methods and analytical approaches

  • Hydrodynamic and CFD analysis
  • Wave-load and motion concepts
  • Structural response analysis
  • Statistical analysis of ocean data

Applications

  • Vessel resistance and seakeeping research
  • Offshore-structure studies
  • Ocean-energy device studies

Scope, inputs and deliverables

Scope of work

  • Definition of the technical question, system boundary and success criteria
  • Analysis, modelling or data work appropriate to your inputs
  • Results with stated assumptions and limits of validity
  • Documentation in a form suitable for reports or publication
  • Feasibility check on: geometry and sea-state data

Typical inputs required from you

  • Geometry and sea-state data
  • Study objectives
  • Test or observational data

Deliverables

  • Analysis report and figures
  • Validation or comparison
  • Methods text

Highly specialised requests are first checked for feasibility from this information. Please do not send confidential data through the public form; describe it first and agree secure transfer afterwards.

Project workflow and method

  1. 01Enquiry and requirement assessment
  2. 02Technical scoping and proposal
  3. 03Execution
  4. 04Quality review and delivery, with an agreed round of revisions

Read the full project workflow.

In depth: how the work is done

  1. Hydrodynamic and CFD analysis

    Potential-flow methods such as panel codes predict wave loads and motions efficiently for many floating bodies, but neglect viscosity. CFD captures viscous effects, green-water and slamming at higher cost. Mesh resolution near the free surface, time-step choice and turbulence modelling influence results. We recommend verification and validation against model-test data and discussion of scale effects.

  2. Wave-load and motion concepts

    Linear wave theory and response amplitude operators describe motions in regular waves; spectral methods combine them with sea-state spectra for irregular waves. Nonlinear effects, including drift forces, slow-drift motion and extreme waves, require time-domain methods. Mooring and riser dynamics add further coupling. We outline assumptions and when linear methods become inadequate.

  3. Structural response analysis

    Hull girders, offshore jackets and floating structures experience wave-induced loads, fatigue and corrosion. Finite element analysis with hydrodynamic load mapping predicts stress. Fatigue assessment uses S-N curves and spectral or rainflow approaches with substantial uncertainty in loads and detail geometry. Corrosion and marine growth change loads and capacity over time.

  4. Statistical analysis of ocean data

    Metocean data comprise buoy measurements, hindcasts and satellite altimetry. Joint distributions of wave height, period and direction, extreme-value analysis, persistence statistics and scatter diagrams support design and operations studies. Data length limits extrapolation, and non-stationarity from climate variability should be discussed. Uncertainty in return values is reported with confidence intervals.

  5. Ocean renewable energy

    Wave, tidal and offshore wind devices require resource assessment, power-performance modelling and survivability analysis. Tidal resources depend on bathymetry and flow, and arrays interact. Studies should use validated resource data and consider environmental effects. Economic claims require clear assumptions about availability and cost.

  6. Model testing and scaling

    Physical model tests use Froude scaling, which cannot also match Reynolds number, creating scale effects for viscous phenomena. Instrumentation uncertainty, tank wall effects and wave calibration affect results. We support planning and analysis of tests and reporting of uncertainty.

  7. Environmental conditions and operability

    Beyond extreme loads, operability studies ask how often a vessel or platform can perform its task, such as crane operations or personnel transfer, given wave and wind limits. Persistence statistics from long wave records give the expected waiting time for weather windows. Seasonal variation and climate variability affect these results. Presenting operability as a function of limiting sea state allows readers to apply the results to their own criteria.

  8. Corrosion, fatigue and ageing in marine structures

    Marine structures degrade through corrosion, fouling and fatigue crack growth. Research on these topics combines laboratory tests, inspection data and probabilistic models. Inspection results update predictions through Bayesian methods, supporting decisions about maintenance. Reports should state the assumed corrosion rates and their basis and avoid presenting deterministic life estimates when uncertainty is large.

  9. Reporting numerical hydrodynamic studies

    A hydrodynamic study should report mesh or panel counts, time steps, domain size, boundary conditions, wave generation and absorption methods and the convergence tests performed. Wave quality in the numerical tank, compared with the target spectrum, is documented before structures are inserted. These details let reviewers judge whether differences between configurations reflect physics or numerical settings.

Quality control and good practice

Quality-control approach

  • Models and analyses are checked against hand calculations, published benchmarks or your data where available.
  • Assumptions, boundary conditions and sources are listed in the deliverable.
  • Units, symbols and terminology are checked for consistency.
  • Limits of validity are stated; the work is research-level analysis, not certification.

Common pitfalls this service helps avoid

  • Using linear theory in extreme conditions. Nonlinear wave effects change loads significantly.
  • Ignoring scale effects. Viscous forces do not scale with Froude similarity.
  • Extrapolating short wave records to long return periods. Uncertainty in extremes is large.
  • Neglecting corrosion and marine growth. Both change structural capacity and hydrodynamic loads over time.

What good reporting looks like

A marine engineering report describes the structure or vessel, the environmental data and statistics, the hydrodynamic and structural models with verification, the load cases, the results with uncertainty, comparison with model tests where available and limitations. It does not provide classification, certification or safety approval for vessels or offshore structures, which are issued by classification societies and regulators.

An illustrative scenario

Hypothetical example written for explanation. It is not a client case, a result or a testimonial.

Suppose a researcher estimates the extreme heave motion of a floating platform. A frequency-domain analysis with linear transfer functions gives one estimate, while a time-domain analysis with nonlinear effects gives a larger extreme. Return values from fifteen years of wave data have wide confidence intervals. The report presents the range, compares with available model-test results and states that mooring nonlinearity was simplified.

Questions to settle before you begin

  • Is linear analysis adequate for my sea states?
  • How long is my wave record relative to the return period?
  • What scale effects affect my model tests?
  • How do I model corrosion over life?
  • Which approvals would the real structure need?

Key terms

Response amplitude operator
The ratio of response amplitude to wave amplitude versus frequency.
Significant wave height
A statistical measure of wave height in a sea state.
Froude scaling
Model scaling that preserves the ratio of inertial to gravity forces.
Metocean
Meteorological and oceanographic conditions.
Rainflow counting
A method for counting stress cycles for fatigue.

Working together on Specialised Applied Sciences projects

Specialised applied-science engagements start with the field-specific question, data and methods, and with an honest check of whether the necessary domain expertise is available for your topic. We ask for protocols, datasets, instrument descriptions and relevant literature. Where a request is highly specialised, feasibility is confirmed before a proposal is issued. Analyses are documented and reproducible, results are reported with uncertainty, and any interpretation beyond the data is labelled. The service does not provide clinical, regulatory or safety advice.

Frequently asked questions

Do you provide classification-society approvals?

No. Approvals come from the relevant classification bodies.

Do you provide class approval calculations?

No. Classification and certification are carried out by recognised bodies.

Can you analyse wave buoy data?

Yes, including extreme-value and joint-distribution analysis.

Can you do hydrodynamic CFD for a hull or floater?

Yes at research level with validation planning.

Can you help with an ocean-energy device study?

Yes, within modelling and data analysis.

How is this service scoped and priced?

After your enquiry we review what you need, ask for missing information and send a written scope and quotation. Price depends on complexity, deliverables and timeline. See the project workflow.

Discuss your project: Marine & Ocean Engineering

Share your objectives, data situation and target outcome. We will assess the scope and suggest sensible next steps.